• Home
  • /
  • Topic
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Negligence
  • /
  • Identify the Torts That Will Be the Basis for the Lawsuits and Explain Why Research Paper
Verified Document

Identify The Torts That Will Be The Basis For The Lawsuits And Explain Why Research Paper

Florida Negligence Analysis Legal Claims for Cal

Negligence- Abe

The first claim that Cal can bring is negligence against Abe for causing the accident. Negligence is the failure of an individual to use reasonable care. Under Florida law, negligence has four components that must be met in order for damages to be obtained.

Legal Duty

A plaintiff must prove that the negligent person had a legal duty to use reasonable care in protecting the injured person

Under Florida law, the requirement is that the standard of care is one of a "reasonably prudent person."

Florida also requires that the incident occurs within a foreseeable-zone-of-risk

Here, Abe was driving the car and Cal was the passenger. It was Abe's duty to safely transport Cal without any accidents or incidents.

Breach of Duty

The second requirement is that Cal prove that Abe breached this duty. A breach of duty is failure to conform to the standard of care.

Here, Abe caused a car accident. By causing a car accident Abe was not acting as a reasonably prudent person because he violated a traffic law causing the accident and failing to transport Cal safely in his car.

Causation

The third requirement is causation. Under Florida law, Cal must prove that Abe was the proximate cause of his injuries. Under proximate cause, the cause of the injuries must have been foreseeable by the defendant.

Here, Cal sustained two injuries during the car accident. The first injury was a minor head injury as a result of the initial collision. The second injury was severe damage to his legs due to Ann hitting the two cars immediately after the initial accident. Both of these injuries are directly stemming from the collision, and are therefor foreseeable in an accident setting.

It can be argued, however, that Cal's second injury is too far remotely removed from the...

The reason is that the leg injury was not directly caused by Abe's negligence, but rather Ann's negligence shortly after the first collision.
Damages

The final necessary element is damages. The plaintiff must have suffered an injury. The injury can be physical, financial, or damage to property

. Here, Cal suffered two physical injuries. He has minor injury to his head and serious damage to his legs.

Negligence- Ann

The second claim that Cal can bring is negligence against Ann for causing the second accident. Negligence is the failure of an individual to use reasonable care. Under Florida law, negligence has four components that must be met in order for damages to be obtained.

Legal Duty

A plaintiff must prove that the negligent person had a legal duty to use reasonable care in protecting the injured person. Under Florida law, the requirement is that the standard of care is one of a "reasonably prudent person." Here, Ann was driving a separate car from Cal. Ann has a legal duty to drive responsibly and follow all traffic laws including not colliding with other vehicles.

Breach of Duty

The second requirement is that Cal prove that Ann breached this duty. A breach of duty is failure to conform to the standard of care. Here, Ann collided with Abe's car which Cal was the passenger. By colliding with Abe's car, Ann breached her duty as a driver to avoid collisions with other vehicles.

Causation

The third requirement is causation. Under Florida law, Cal must prove that Ann was the proximate cause of his injuries. Under proximate cause, the cause of the injuries must have been foreseeable by the defendant. Here, Ann collided with the car Cal was driving resulting in a serious injury to his legs. It is foreseeable that car collisions cause injuries to drivers and passengers. Thus, Ann was the proximate cause of…

Sources used in this document:
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm § 3 (P.F.D. No. 1, 2005)

Restatement (Third) of Torts section 17

Florida Code TITLE XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE PART II DAMAGES section 768.73 Punitive damages; limitation.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

IBM Canada Over the Last
Words: 3028 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

As it is important for IBM Canada, to: identify different types of legal liabilities and their possible consequences on a regular basis. Some of the main legal risks being faced by the company include: employee lawsuits, cyber issues, product liability, patent / licensing and criminal investigations / compliance. Employee Lawsuits An employee lawsuit is a legal issue of paramount importance for IBM Canada. Discontent employees can file a claim against the

Lifting the Corporate Veil Limited
Words: 4667 Length: 13 Document Type: Essay

This was followed by the enactments by House of Lords in 1897 in Solomon v. Solomon & Company. The concepts of corporate entity and limited liability were incorporated in English law in the same period. In this case, the head court announced that a company is a separate legal individual completely different from the members or shareholders. From this announcement, we can say that a company is a separate legal

Sales Contracts and Products Liability
Words: 696 Length: 2 Document Type: Article Review

(O'Reilly, 2003, p.2) But the company is not legally liable if it did all necessary testing, warning, and reasonable evaluation of safety, if for example, an unexpected result occurs through the use of the product. O'Reilly finds the reasonable person standard troubling, as the reasonable 'average' consumer will not have specialized knowledge that a manufacturer should have about the product he or she is selling. He believes government agencies have

Protocols of Litigating a Civil
Words: 7018 Length: 26 Document Type: Essay

This is usually a low standard to achieve. As long as a person acts in a way which avails the person of the protection of the laws of that state, that person has subjected themselves to the jurisdiction of that state (International Shoe). Next, the complaint will allege subject matter jurisdiction, i.e., that the lawsuit fulfill the requirements for this court to hear it? Pertinent requirements can include how much

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now