Florida Negligence Analysis
Legal Claims for Cal
Negligence- Abe
The first claim that Cal can bring is negligence against Abe for causing the accident. Negligence is the failure of an individual to use reasonable care. Under Florida law, negligence has four components that must be met in order for damages to be obtained.
Legal Duty
A plaintiff must prove that the negligent person had a legal duty to use reasonable care in protecting the injured person
Under Florida law, the requirement is that the standard of care is one of a "reasonably prudent person."
Florida also requires that the incident occurs within a foreseeable-zone-of-risk
Here, Abe was driving the car and Cal was the passenger. It was Abe's duty to safely transport Cal without any accidents or incidents.
Breach of Duty
The second requirement is that Cal prove that Abe breached this duty. A breach of duty is failure to conform to the standard of care.
Here, Abe caused a car accident. By causing a car accident Abe was not acting as a reasonably prudent person because he violated a traffic law causing the accident and failing to transport Cal safely in his car.
Causation
The third requirement is causation. Under Florida law, Cal must prove that Abe was the proximate cause of his injuries. Under proximate cause, the cause of the injuries must have been foreseeable by the defendant.
Here, Cal sustained two injuries during the car accident. The first injury was a minor head injury as a result of the initial collision. The second injury was severe damage to his legs due to Ann hitting the two cars immediately after the initial accident. Both of these injuries are directly stemming from the collision, and are therefor foreseeable in an accident setting.
It can be argued, however, that Cal's second injury is too far remotely removed from the...
As it is important for IBM Canada, to: identify different types of legal liabilities and their possible consequences on a regular basis. Some of the main legal risks being faced by the company include: employee lawsuits, cyber issues, product liability, patent / licensing and criminal investigations / compliance. Employee Lawsuits An employee lawsuit is a legal issue of paramount importance for IBM Canada. Discontent employees can file a claim against the
This was followed by the enactments by House of Lords in 1897 in Solomon v. Solomon & Company. The concepts of corporate entity and limited liability were incorporated in English law in the same period. In this case, the head court announced that a company is a separate legal individual completely different from the members or shareholders. From this announcement, we can say that a company is a separate legal
(O'Reilly, 2003, p.2) But the company is not legally liable if it did all necessary testing, warning, and reasonable evaluation of safety, if for example, an unexpected result occurs through the use of the product. O'Reilly finds the reasonable person standard troubling, as the reasonable 'average' consumer will not have specialized knowledge that a manufacturer should have about the product he or she is selling. He believes government agencies have
This is usually a low standard to achieve. As long as a person acts in a way which avails the person of the protection of the laws of that state, that person has subjected themselves to the jurisdiction of that state (International Shoe). Next, the complaint will allege subject matter jurisdiction, i.e., that the lawsuit fulfill the requirements for this court to hear it? Pertinent requirements can include how much
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now